11 July 2011 10:00 GMT / By Jamie Carter
Remember when the government deemed plasmas TVs the “4x4s of the living room”? Bang & Olufsen’s latest is more a road-train, clocking-in at a mighty 85-inches in diameter - so four times bigger than a 42-inch TV.
It’s high-def, it’s 3D, it’s got a swanky metallic finish (in black, silver, red, blue, golden or gunmetal, no less) … and its costs over £66,000.
Should any TV cost that much? Of course not, though don't make the mistake of comparing this to a mass market effort from the likes of Samsung, Sony, LG or Toshiba (we’ll make an exception for Panasonic; the BeoVision 4-85 is based around the same panel used in the TH-85VX200). Anything selling for this much does so on the understanding that there is no production line of any note, and no economies of scale. In short, each TV has to be custom made; you’re paying this much because no one else has one.
The Danish super-brand has suffered in recent times from a rather diluted approach whereby a few “entry level” TVs slightly lowered the tone - especially since few in B&O’s range packed the latest and greatest TV tech.

That same argument can’t be thrown at this monster plasma; Bang & Olufsen’s first-ever 3DTV is virtually impossible to beat on any level. This is also the brand’s first plasma TV for some time, the tech having wrongly gained an “old fashioned” reputation among the kind of consumers this TV is aimed at. Thus, you won't see the word “plasma” used in any literature, though its use here helps confirm the theory that the gas tech performs better with 3D than LCD/LED screens. Everybody knows that.
It’s a risk that pays off in spades. The huge size of the screen helps; the bigger the better for watching 3D, primarily because it covers more of your peripheral vision, so is more life-like (a factor that’s ignored by those pedaling 32-inch 3DTVs). The detail in both 3D and 2D pictures is exquisite, while the contrast - already very decent in 2D footage - is increased still further when watching 3D. That’s the effect of the 3D glasses, which lowers the perceived brightness considerably; something that also helps the colours of 3D Blu-ray discs really standout. Awesome.
Standard definition isn’t as impressive - it’s a hell of a stretch for a low bit-rate picture from Freeview to fill any screen this size without breaking-up, but the BeoVision 4-85 manages things pretty well. A Freeview HD tuner inside wouldn't go amiss, and though our sample didn't include one, it will soon be available. The GUI that controls the TVs main onscreen menus and digital TV guide is very simple and lacks the pizzazz of a Sony or LG TV, but there are reasons for that.
Firstly, it’s presumed that any buyer of this TV will already have a HD-capable set-top box from Sky or Virgin Media, and, secondly, there’s a robot on hand to tweak the pictures. Yes - a robot. Well, a robot eye, actually; it rears its head every 90-100 hours of viewing (or on-demand) from the top of the screen, lowers itself to in front of the panel, then takes some measurements. It then adjusts the picture back to B&O’s own industry standard presets (there’s very little picture parameters that can be changed by the viewer) and dives back into its hole. It does this because the picture quality - largely the brightness - changes ever so slightly as time goes by.

There’s more mechanisation on hand. A stand is available (from £4,000) that not only supports the TV and proffers a triangular centre (mono) speaker (to be used in conjunction with a surround sound set-up only), but lowers to TV to within a few centimeters of the floor when it’s switched off. It also swivels the TV a few degrees either side.
Adding to the expense still further is a choice of remote controls both programmable to operate virtually anything you want - 3D Blu-ray player, set-top box and even motorised curtains; the traditional Beo4, or OLED touchscreen Beo6 (£230 and £600 respectively).
If £0 sounds better than £600, you could always opt for BeoLink app, a free download from iTunes or the Android Market, and operate the BeoVision 4-85 from your smartphone.
Even mid-range TVs have apps these days, but BeoLink is smarter than all the rest. Provided you've had the TV networked to a B&O Master Link Gateway and you've got a lot of other gear talking to it (or on a Creston or AMX home automation system) the polished app can be used to lower blinds, dim the lights, tamper with temperature and even play music in different zones of your, err, rather large pad. As an app it's simple, comprising gestures and easy source selection. Zones can be named, "scenes" created and, of course, the TV controlled without it stretching to innumerable different pages.
Verdict
Aimed at wealthy types who want the best from technology without the hassle, this 3D plasma is among the best around in its class. The extra cash has gone on some mechanised functions that add wow factor, but little else, though the BeoVision 4-85 is not about value for money. An exercise in what’s possible when money isn't an object, the BeoVision 4-85 is a mightily diverting slab of tech.
Score
Review Recap
- Made by
- BangAndOlufsen
- Price as reviewed
- £66,000
- The good
- Pin-sharp HD, convincing 3D, wow factor
- The bad
- Remote control not included, mono speaker, lacks Freeview HD
- Quick verdict
- Aimed at wealthy types who want the best from technology without the hassle, this 3D plasma is among the best around in its class. The extra cash has gone on some mechanised functions that add wow factor, but little else, though the BeoVision 4-85 is not about value for money
- Score
-
- Winner

Recommended articles
Televisions, Bang And Olufsen, Bang and Olufsen BeoVision, Plasma televisions, 3D, 3DTV, Home Cinema








The death of plasma? Panasonic sales drop by 41 per cent Posts £6.3 billion loss
Panasonic TX-P50ST30 To 3D or not to 3D?
Samsung PS51D8000 Second in command
Sony: UK is last big market for plasma TV technology Every other country has moved on
Panasonic TX-P50VT30 The ultimate TV?
Is Facebook about to buy Opera to create own Facebook browser? EXCLUSIVE: Pocket-lint source tells us "yes"
Which smartphone is best for the sun? Screens for the Summer
Batman Nokia Lumia 900: Limited edition phone heading to UK Who are you? I'm Batman
Canon EOS 5D MK III It's a hat-trick
Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Roger likes a Tango at 12 o'clock
Porsche 911 Carrera (991) 2012 pictures and hands-on WANT
Microsoft Office coming to iPad and Android tablets this November A change of heart?
APP OF THE DAY: Wyse PocketCloud Remote (Android) Work on your PC from anywhere in the world
Toshiba AT300: The quad-core 10.1-inch ICS Android tablet UPDATE: Pricing unveiled
Sega serves up Virtua Tennis Challenge on the iPad and iPhone Smash-ing
80-inch Windows 8 tablet already exists - in Microsoft CEO's office Could this be the future?
LG OLED: The future of television? Is it all it's cracked up to be?
Yahoo enters the browser business, targets your iPhone, iPad and desktop Search and browse at the same time
LG 55-inch OLED TV: Price and availability Largest, thinnest, lightest... priciest
The changing face of movie special effects Tips for low-budget film-makers
Olympus OM-D E-M5 review
The compact system camera to beat all others?
Nokia Lumia 900 review
Is big beautiful?
HTC One V review
V for victory?
FIFA 12: UEFA Euro 2012 review
Lacks polish, if not the Polish
Huawei Ascend G300 review
Big bang for your hundred quid
Asus Transformer Pad TF300T review
Transforms your money in to a great tablet
Nikon Coolpix P510 review
Does the P510 zoom beyond expectations?
Fujifilm X-Pro1 review
Like a Leica
BlackBerry Curve 9320 review
A BB for beginners?
Fujifilm FinePix HS30EXR review
Can Fujifilm’s latest put the ‘super’ in superzoom?
Mazda CX5 2.2 TDI AWD review
A very zoomy SUV
HP Envy 14 Spectre review
The Ultrabook that isn't an Ultrabook
The Walking Dead: The Game review
Fleshed out zombie bonanza
Sony Cyber-shot HX200V review
Superzoom master keeps the bar high