26 March 2010 9:15 GMT / By Stuart Miles
The way we access the Internet will most likely fundamentally change following the decision by The Times and Sunday Times to start charging to visit their websites.
Called a "paywall", the newspaper will charge users £1 for a day's access and £2 for the week to get the news content from the British paper that has previously been free.
Rupert Murdoch, the media mogul and paper's owner, believes that doing so will allow him to create a captured audience that advertisers will be happy to target and, more importantly, pay more money in order to do so.
In an attempt to maximise revenue and convince people to buy subscriptions for the parts they care about, The Times and Sunday Times websites, currently sitting under the Timesonline domain, will split, get a redesign and then start charging customers to access content.
"This is just the start. The Times and The Sunday Times are the first of our four titles in the UK to move to this new approach. We will continue to develop our digital products and to invest and innovate for our customers", News International's chief executive Rebekah Brooks told the BBC.
The discussion over whether or not online media outlets should charge for news has been raging for a long time with new media heavily against the idea.
Currently only a handful of titles such as the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times charge for access to their data.
While both have seen success, this is the first time that a paywall has been erected around a more consumer-friendly newspaper.
Do you think it's a good idea? Will it mean better journalism? If you won't pay for The Times online what sites would you pay for to access? Let us know in the comments below.
Via: news.bbc.co.uk
Software, Online, paywall, The Times, The Sunday Times, News International



Is Facebook about to buy Opera to create own Facebook browser? EXCLUSIVE: Pocket-lint source tells us "yes"
APP OF THE DAY: The Weather Channel review (iPhone / iPod touch) Tonight for the first time, just about half-past ten...
Mazda CX5 2.2 TDI AWD A very zoomy SUV
Apple testing 3.95-inch iPhone 5, with 16:9 display 1136 x 640 resolution revolution
Jony Ive: Next Apple product is our most important and best work yet Better than iPod, iPad and iPhone?
Running blind: How Simon Wheatcroft uses his iPhone to see Runkeeper and more let this man run solo
Which smartphone is best for the sun? Screens for the Summer
WIN: Tickets to Ibiza Rocks to see Maverick Sabre and Labrinth live Epic prize courtesy of Sony
Dragon's Dogma Adventure time
Batman Nokia Lumia 900: Limited edition phone heading to UK Who are you? I'm Batman
Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Roger likes a Tango at 12 o'clock
Bungie Destiny contract reveals Xbox 720 will arrive in 2013 - E3 announcement? Commissioned for Xbox 360 and "next Xbox"
Porsche 911 Carrera (991) 2012 pictures and hands-on WANT
Robert Moog Google doodle best yet, even better than Les Paul Synthesizer synthesiser
British Gas turns Team GB swimming stars into superheroes Aquanauts assemble
Olympus OM-D E-M5 review
The compact system camera to beat all others?
Nokia Lumia 900 review
Is big beautiful?
HTC One V review
V for victory?
Huawei Ascend G300 review
Big bang for your hundred quid
FIFA 12: UEFA Euro 2012 review
Lacks polish, if not the Polish
Asus Transformer Pad TF300T review
Transforms your money in to a great tablet
Nikon Coolpix P510 review
Does the P510 zoom beyond expectations?
Fujifilm X-Pro1 review
Like a Leica
Volkswagen Beetle Design 1.2TSi DSG review
The bug is back. Again.
BlackBerry Curve 9320 review
A BB for beginners?
Fujifilm FinePix HS30EXR review
Can Fujifilm’s latest put the ‘super’ in superzoom?
HP Envy 14 Spectre review
The Ultrabook that isn't an Ultrabook
The Walking Dead: The Game review
Fleshed out zombie bonanza
Nikon Coolpix S6300 review
Point, shoot and scoot