17 February 2010 21:23 GMT / By Duncan Geere
A survey commissioned by Panasonic and undertaken by researchers at a Munich University has found that plasma televisions cause less eye strain than an LCD at a similar brightness level.
The researchers sat 31 people - male and female - down in front of a series of different types of content displayed on alternate plasma and LCD televisions and recorded their eye movements, both around the eye and the size of the iris. They watched a 45 minute compilation of a series of adverts, a clip from an action film, and a clip from a calmer movie.
The team found that less pupil diameter variation was seen when watching plasma televisions than watching an LCD of similar brightness, with the result achieving statistical significance at the 95% level. The difference was particularly noticeable when watching adverts and the action movie.
Plasma watchers also saw less eye movement than LCD viewers while watching the action movie though the results were similar for the other content types. This result achieved statistical significance at a 99% confidence level.
You'll want to take the results with a pinch of salt, however. While we're not doubting the ethics of the researchers behind the project, the fact that one of the world's largest plasma television manufacturers bankrolled a survey where plasmas came out on top should raise a few eyebrows. We wonder if the company would be publishing the results if LCD displays proved less straining.
Home Cinema, Surveys, Plasma televisions, LCD televisions, Panasonic, Statistics



Kids shun toys for technology Survey finds children spend an hour a day using tech
Over quarter of Brits admit to taking porn pics or videos using camera phones And 12 per cent still have sordid snaps of the ex
Off your Facebook: Drunks make up 76 per cent of photos on site in UK Overly social network
Is Facebook about to buy Opera to create own Facebook browser? EXCLUSIVE: Pocket-lint source tells us "yes"
APP OF THE DAY: The Weather Channel review (iPhone / iPod touch) Tonight for the first time, just about half-past ten...
Mazda CX5 2.2 TDI AWD A very zoomy SUV
Apple testing 3.95-inch iPhone 5, with 16:9 display 1136 x 640 resolution revolution
Jony Ive: Next Apple product is our most important and best work yet Better than iPod, iPad and iPhone?
Running blind: How Simon Wheatcroft uses his iPhone to see Runkeeper and more let this man run solo
WIN: Tickets to Ibiza Rocks to see Maverick Sabre and Labrinth live Epic prize courtesy of Sony
Which smartphone is best for the sun? Screens for the Summer
Dragon's Dogma Adventure time
Batman Nokia Lumia 900: Limited edition phone heading to UK Who are you? I'm Batman
Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Roger likes a Tango at 12 o'clock
Bungie Destiny contract reveals Xbox 720 will arrive in 2013 - E3 announcement? Commissioned for Xbox 360 and "next Xbox"
Robert Moog Google doodle best yet, even better than Les Paul Synthesizer synthesiser
Porsche 911 Carrera (991) 2012 pictures and hands-on WANT
British Gas turns Team GB swimming stars into superheroes Aquanauts assemble
Olympus OM-D E-M5 review
The compact system camera to beat all others?
Nokia Lumia 900 review
Is big beautiful?
HTC One V review
V for victory?
Huawei Ascend G300 review
Big bang for your hundred quid
FIFA 12: UEFA Euro 2012 review
Lacks polish, if not the Polish
Asus Transformer Pad TF300T review
Transforms your money in to a great tablet
Nikon Coolpix P510 review
Does the P510 zoom beyond expectations?
Fujifilm X-Pro1 review
Like a Leica
Volkswagen Beetle Design 1.2TSi DSG review
The bug is back. Again.
BlackBerry Curve 9320 review
A BB for beginners?
Fujifilm FinePix HS30EXR review
Can Fujifilm’s latest put the ‘super’ in superzoom?
HP Envy 14 Spectre review
The Ultrabook that isn't an Ultrabook
The Walking Dead: The Game review
Fleshed out zombie bonanza
Nikon Coolpix S6300 review
Point, shoot and scoot