Twitter comes to Bing
Facebook to come, but later
21 October 2009 19:45 GMT / By Stuart Miles
Microsoft's digital head Qi Lu has confirmed, as rumoured earlier today, that it has signed a non-exclusive deal with Twitter and Facebook to provide status updates to its Bing search engine.
The two new services will allow users to use Bing to search tweets in real-time posted on the micro-blogging service.
"We have two deals to announce", said the demo man at the Web 2.0 summit conference. "The first is Twitter, which will be going live in the beta straight away, the second is Facebook which will come later".
Both systems will access all public data, leaving direct messages secure and out of sight.
The tweets will, however, be vetted for quality and factor in a number of features including quality of tweet, the length and relevancy of the tweet, the twitter users social standing (ie number of followers) as well as the tweet is being re-tweeted.
Users will be able to search tweets via a real-time stream as well as a cloud trending option.
Microsoft has also said that it will strip out bit.ly links turning them back into full url's so users can see what the domain is before clicking on it.
The beta, which can be accessed via bing.com/twitter should be live in the next hour.
UPDATE: Google has now said that it will be offering Twitter status updates as well.
Software, Online, Social networking, Search engines, Microsoft, Twitter, Facebook, Bing Amazon.co.uk, play.com, pixmania.co.uk, Currys.co.uk, Dixons.co.uk, 7dayshop.com, ebay.co.uk Amazon.com, bestbuy.com, ebay.com
Latest in Software
Latest on Pocket-lint.com
-
AUDIO
Daily News Roundup - 19/11/09
-
SOFTWARE
Google Chrome OS Detailed
-
SOFTWARE
Google Chrome OS: What You Need To Know




GAMING
UPDATE: Russia has not banned Modern Warfare 2 "No Russian" provokes anger
CAMERAS
Next-gen Flip camcorder to boast Wi-Fi EXCLUSIVE: Cisco buy-out sees networking functionality added to popular range
CAMERAS
Canon PowerShot S90 digital camera How much fun can you pack into a compact?




Comments