Adobe takes over Macromedia in US$3.4bn stock raid
Web and DTP makers join forces
18 April 2005 11:20 GMT / By Stuart Miles
Or that's UK£1.8billion between friends. It was only a matter of time before Macromedia bought a few other companies or became shark bait by itself. Its rise to prominence came first with Flash, which rose from a nice back-end facilitator to websites until whole domains were coded with the language - and the rest is history. Now the company's independence is a part of that history. Like Symantec's axing of Drive Image to cancel the competition to the Norton Ghost Series, there are now two large groups of print and web publishing users waiting to find out which applications from either side will get the chop - in addition to the development teams for those less popular or less often updated programs.
As an all-paper deal, former Macromedia shareholders will receive 0.69 of an Adobe share for each Macromedia one. Given that our site is created using former Macromedia tools, Adobe has now tightened its grip over many standardised creation tools for internet content - and it's not like it didn't already have a sizeable print presence. Given that there are conflicting quotes in the media regarding the intended future - some say it wants to reduce its reliance on Acrobat while others restate its intent to make .PDF dominant - we'll have to wait and see whether rival Microsoft's plan to attempt to create a file format as widespread as .PDF and even more dominant than its own .DOC and .XLS files, actually become reality in Longhorn. We predict business as usual until users on support contracts are informed of any concrete changes.
Latest in Biz
Latest on Pocket-lint
-
SOFTWARE
Bill Gates No Longer Richest Man
-
PHONES
Vodafone To Slash Another 500 Jobs
PHONES
HTC Legend mobile phone Will it be legendary?
CAMERAS
Olympus E-PL1 camera Is the 3rd generation Digital Pen much improved with flash?
PHONES
iPhone 4G snapped in ultimate spy shot homage You've got to give it to them - at least they've tried.






Comments